Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel 3855U

Intel 3855U

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3050

Report a correction
Significantly better performance per watt 8.65 pt/W vs 5.17 pt/W More than 65% better performance per watt
Lower typical power consumption 4.88W vs 12.19W 2.5x lower typical power consumption
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.14 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Lower annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year vs 3.61 $/year 2.5x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year vs 13.14 $/year 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel 3855U

Reasons to consider the
Intel 3855U

Report a correction
Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score 1,758 vs 879 2x better geekbench 3 single core score
Better performance per dollar 0.72 pt/$ vs 0.48 pt/$ Around 50% better performance per dollar
Newer Oct, 2015 vs Jan, 2015 Release date 9 months later

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3050 vs 3855U

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

3855U
2,869

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

3855U
1,758

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N3050
350.4 MB/s
3855U
2,220 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

3855U
1,715

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N3050  vs
3855U 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 6W 15W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 13.14 $/year
Performance per watt 8.65 pt/W 5.17 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 12.19W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Celeron N3050  vs
3855U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
Manufacture process 14 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.14 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.14 GHz 1.6 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics 510
Number of displays supported 3 3
GPU clock speed 320 MHz 300 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1866
DDR3L-1600
LPDDR3-1600
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 29,866.66 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 32,768 MB
Intel Celeron N3050
Report a correction
Intel 3855U
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus