Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3050

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Celeron N3050 vs the AMD Turion 64 X2 technology RM-72.

Front view of AMD Turion 64 X2 technology RM-72

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion 64 X2 technology RM-72

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Turion 64 X2 technology RM-72 vs the Intel Celeron N3050.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3050 vs Turion 64 X2 technology RM-72

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N3050  vs
Turion 64 X2 technology RM-72 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 2.1 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Celeron N3050  vs
Turion 64 X2 technology RM-72 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.14 GHz 2.13 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 2.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.14 GHz 2.13 GHz

power consumption

TDP 6W 35W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 8.65 pt/W 1.03 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 28.44W
Intel Celeron N3050
Report a correction
AMD Turion 64 X2 technology RM-72
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus