Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3050

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Front view of AMD Turion 64 X2 56

Reasons to consider the
AMD Turion 64 X2 56

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Turion 64 X2 56 vs the Intel Celeron N3050.

Features Key features of the Celeron N3050  vs Turion 64 X2 56 

clock speed

Celeron N3050
1.6 GHz
Turion 64 X2 56
1.8 GHz

turbo clock speed

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N3050  vs
Turion 64 X2 56 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.8 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.16 GHz 0 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
AES

details

Celeron N3050  vs
Turion 64 X2 56 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 0 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 320 MHz N/A

power consumption

TDP 6W 33W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 7.95 $/year
Typical power consumption 4.88W 26.81W
Intel Celeron N3050
Report a correction
AMD Turion 64 X2 56
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus