CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N3050 vs 3200+ among laptop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron N3050 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron N3050  based on its features.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3050

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Front view of AMD Sempron 3200+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Sempron 3200+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Sempron 3200+ vs the Intel Celeron N3050.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3050 vs Sempron 3200+

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N3050
350.4 MB/s
Sempron 3200+
22.5 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N3050  vs
Sempron 3200+ 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 6W 62W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 14.94 $/year
Performance per watt 8.65 pt/W 0.31 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 50.38W

details

Celeron N3050  vs
Sempron 3200+ 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 2 MB 0 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.14 GHz 2.59 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 3 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.14 GHz 2.59 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 320 MHz N/A
Intel Celeron N3050
Report a correction
AMD Sempron 3200+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus