Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3050

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Front view of AMD Phenom II P960

Reasons to consider the
AMD Phenom II P960

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Phenom II P960 vs the Intel Celeron N3050.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3050 vs Phenom II P960

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N3050
350.4 MB/s
Phenom II P960
70,850 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N3050  vs
Phenom II P960 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 6W 25W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 6.02 $/year
Performance per watt 8.65 pt/W 3.46 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 20.31W

details

Celeron N3050  vs
Phenom II P960 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.14 GHz 1.82 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.8 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.14 GHz 1.82 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 320 MHz N/A
Intel Celeron N3050
Report a correction
AMD Phenom II P960
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus