Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3050

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Front view of AMD Phenom II P840

Reasons to consider the
AMD Phenom II P840

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Phenom II P840 vs the Intel Celeron N3050.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3050 vs Phenom II P840

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N3050
350.4 MB/s
Phenom II P840
76,000 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N3050  vs
Phenom II P840 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.9 GHz
Cores Dual core Tri core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 6W 35W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 8.65 pt/W 2.3 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 28.44W

details

Celeron N3050  vs
Phenom II P840 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 3
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.67 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.14 GHz 1.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.14 GHz 1.9 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 320 MHz N/A
Intel Celeron N3050
Report a correction
AMD Phenom II P840
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus