Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron N3050

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3050

Report a correction
Much higher turbo clock speed 2.16 GHz vs None Compared to all cpus, 2.16 GHz turbo clock speed is just OK
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1 GHz More than 60% higher clock speed
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Higher GPU clock speed 320 MHz vs 225 MHz More than 40% higher GPU clock speed
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 1,584 vs 890 Around 80% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Newer Jan, 2015 vs Jul, 2013 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of AMD G-Series GX-210JA

Reasons to consider the
AMD G-Series GX-210JA

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 392,400 MB/s vs 350.4 MB/s More than 1119.8x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much better performance per watt 25.75 pt/W vs 8.65 pt/W Around 3x better performance per watt

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3050 vs G-Series GX-210JA

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N3050
350.4 MB/s
G-Series GX-210JA
392,400 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N3050  vs
G-Series GX-210JA 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.16 GHz None
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1066
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 8,533.33 MB/s

details

Celeron N3050  vs
G-Series GX-210JA 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 28 nm

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics AMD Radeon HD 8180
GPU clock speed 320 MHz 225 MHz

power consumption

TDP 6W 6W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 1.45 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 5.26 $/year
Performance per watt 8.65 pt/W 25.75 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 4.88W
Intel Celeron N3050
Report a correction
AMD G-Series GX-210JA
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus