Intel Celeron N3050 vs AMD E1 for AIOs 7010 |
Released January, 2015
Intel Celeron N3050
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron N3050
 | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB | | Higher turbo clock speed 2.16 GHz |
| | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm | | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
VS
First seen on January, 2016
AMD E1 for AIOs 7010
- 1.5 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD E1 for AIOs 7010
| | Higher GPU clock speed 400 MHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher turbo clock speed | 2.16 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | Around 45% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 28 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
| Higher GPU clock speed | 400 MHz | vs | 320 MHz | 25% higher GPU clock speed | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Celeron N3050 vs E1 for AIOs 7010
clock speed
turbo clock speed
L2 cache
gpu clock speed
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron N3050 | vs | E1 for AIOs 7010 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| AES | |||
| FMA4 | |||
| AVX | |||
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3L-1333 | |||
details | Celeron N3050 | vs | E1 for AIOs 7010 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 28 nm | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Radeon™ R2 | |
| GPU clock speed | 320 MHz | 400 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 6W | 10W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 2.41 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | 8.76 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 8.13W | |
 Intel Celeron N3050  Report a correction |  AMD E1 for AIOs 7010 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $107 | $107 | |
| Intel Celeron N2840 vs N3050 | ||
 | VS | |
| $161 | $107 | |
| Intel Pentium N3700 vs Celeron N3050 | ||
 | VS | |
| $275 | $107 | |
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Celeron N3050 | ||
 | VS | |
| $17 | $107 | |
| Intel Atom Z3735F vs Celeron N3050 | ||
 | VS | |
| $21 | $107 | |
| Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300 vs Celeron N3050 | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | ||
| Intel N3060 vs Celeron N3050 | ||
 | VS | |
| $161 | $107 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Celeron N3050 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
| | VS | |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
