CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N3050 vs 2500 among laptop CPUs (up to 15W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.4

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD E1 2500 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD E1 2500  based on its features.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3050

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Celeron N3050 vs the AMD E1 2500.

Front view of AMD E1 2500

Reasons to consider the
AMD E1 2500

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD E1 2500 vs the Intel Celeron N3050.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3050 vs E1 2500

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron N3050
6.77 mHash/s
E1 2500
13.15 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron N3050
69.59 fps
E1 2500
53.32 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron N3050
0.44 fps
E1 2500
0.17 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

E1 2500
1,221

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N3050
350.4 MB/s
E1 2500
677,550 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N3050  vs
E1 2500 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.16 GHz None
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 6W 15W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 3.61 $/year
Performance per watt 8.65 pt/W 12.98 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 12.19W

details

Celeron N3050  vs
E1 2500 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.14 GHz 1.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.14 GHz 1.4 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon™ HD 8240
GPU clock speed 320 MHz 400 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3L-1333
Intel Celeron N3050
Report a correction
AMD E1 2500
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus