Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3050

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Front view of AMD Athlon II PCs M320

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon II PCs M320

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon II PCs M320 vs the Intel Celeron N3050.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3050 vs Athlon II PCs M320

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N3050
350.4 MB/s
Athlon II PCs M320
83,750 MB/s

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N3050  vs
Athlon II PCs M320 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 2.1 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 6W 35W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 8.65 pt/W 2.23 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 28.44W

details

Celeron N3050  vs
Athlon II PCs M320 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.14 GHz 2.11 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 2.1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.14 GHz 2.11 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 3 N/A
GPU clock speed 320 MHz N/A
Intel Celeron N3050
Report a correction
AMD Athlon II PCs M320
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus