Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3050

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 65 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much lower typical power consumption 4.88W vs 97.88W 20.1x lower typical power consumption
Much better performance per watt 8.65 pt/W vs 0.32 pt/W Around 27x better performance per watt
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Newer Jan, 2015 vs Nov, 2008 Release date over 6 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year vs 40.46 $/year 28x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year vs 89.18 $/year 17x lower annual commercial energy cost
Slightly better geekbench 3 AES single core score 350.4 MB/s vs 41.1 MB/s More than 8.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Front view of AMD Athlon 64 X2 3250e

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3250e

Report a correction
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.48 GHz vs 2.14 GHz More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3050 vs Athlon 64 X2 3250e

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N3050
350.4 MB/s
Athlon 64 X2 3250e
41.1 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N3050  vs
Athlon 64 X2 3250e 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.5 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Celeron N3050  vs
Athlon 64 X2 3250e 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.14 GHz 2.48 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.14 GHz 2.48 GHz

power consumption

TDP 6W 22W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 40.46 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year 89.18 $/year
Performance per watt 8.65 pt/W 0.32 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 97.88W
Intel Celeron N3050
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 X2 3250e
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus