Intel Celeron N3050 vs AMD A6 5200

	Performance
	Benchmark performance using all cores
Celeron N3050 5.0 A6 5200 4.0 Core i3 4005U 4.0
PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

	Single-core Performance
	Individual core benchmark performance
Celeron N3050 5.0 A6 5200 5.9 Core i3 4005U 7.0
PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

	Integrated Graphics
	Integrated GPU performance for graphics
Celeron N3050 n.d. A6 5200 0.8 Core i3 4005U 3.5
Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

	Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)
	Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing
Celeron N3050 5.5 A6 5200 6.0 Core i3 4005U 6.8
CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

	Performance per Watt
	How efficiently does the processor use electricity?
Celeron N3050 7.4 A6 5200 4.9 Core i3 4005U 5.6
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

	Value
	Are you paying a premium for performance?
Celeron N3050 n.d. A6 5200 6.0 Core i3 4005U 6.5
Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5	CPUBoss Score
	Combination of all six facets
Celeron N3050 5.0 A6 5200 2.2 Core i3 4005U 4.5

Winner
AMD A6 5200

CPUBoss recommends the AMD A6 5200 based on its features.

See full details

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

VS

Intel Celeron N3050

Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Front view of AMD A6 5200

AMD A6 5200

Join the discussion

Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3050

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Celeron N3050 vs the AMD A6 5200.

Front view of AMD A6 5200

Reasons to consider the
AMD A6 5200

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD A6 5200 vs the Intel Celeron N3050.

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

6.77 mHash/s

19 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

4.48 mPixels/s

3.36 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

0.44 fps

0.51 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

1,584

3,330

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

879

1,061

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

350.4 MB/s

982,400 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

885

2,403

PassMark (Single Core)

467

778

summary	Celeron N3050	vs	A6 5200
Clock speed	1.6 GHz		2 GHz
Turbo clock speed	2.16 GHz		0 GHz
Cores	Dual core		Quad core
features
Has a NX bit	Yes		Yes
Has virtualization support	Yes		Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling	Yes		Yes
power consumption
TDP	6W		25W
Annual home energy cost	1.45 $/year		6.02 $/year
Performance per watt	8.65 pt/W		9.41 pt/W
Typical power consumption	4.88W		20.31W

details	Celeron N3050	vs	A6 5200
Architecture	x86-64		x86-64
Threads	2		4
L2 cache	2 MB		2 MB
L2 cache per core	1 MB/core		0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process	14 nm		28 nm
Max CPUs	1		1
overclocking
Overclocked clock speed	2.14 GHz		2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water)	1.6 GHz		2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air)	2.14 GHz		2 GHz
integrated graphics
GPU	GPU		GPU
Label	Intel® HD Graphics		Radeon™ HD 8400
GPU clock speed	320 MHz		600 MHz
memory controller
Memory controller	Built-in		Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1600

Intel Celeron N3050

Report a correction

AMD A6 5200

Report a correction

Laptops

Looking for a laptop?

26 laptops with the Intel Celeron N3050, starting from $145
6 laptops with the AMD A6 5200, starting from $279

Follow us

Compare

Popular Comparisons

VS

N3050 vs N2840

VS

5200 vs 3470

Comments

comments powered by Disqus