CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N3050 vs 5000 among laptop CPUs (up to 15W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron N3050 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron N3050  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3050

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Celeron N3050 vs the AMD A4 5000.

Front view of AMD A4 5000

Reasons to consider the
AMD A4 5000

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD A4 5000 vs the Intel Celeron N3050.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3050 vs A4 5000

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron N3050
6.77 mHash/s
A4 5000
16.17 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Celeron N3050
4.48 mPixels/s
A4 5000
2.9 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron N3050
0.44 fps
A4 5000
0.41 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A4 5000
2,562

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N3050
350.4 MB/s
A4 5000
752,800 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N3050  vs
A4 5000 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.55 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.16 GHz 0 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
AVX
SSE3
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3-1600
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s

details

Celeron N3050  vs
A4 5000 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon HD 8330

power consumption

TDP 6W 13.5W
Annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year 3.25 $/year
Performance per watt 8.65 pt/W 13.97 pt/W
Typical power consumption 4.88W 10.97W
Intel Celeron N3050
Report a correction
AMD A4 5000
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus