Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N3000

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3000

Report a correction
Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 22 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per watt 11.42 pt/W vs 4.27 pt/W Around 2.8x better performance per watt
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More number of displays supported 3 vs 2 1 more number of displays supported
Lower typical power consumption 3.25W vs 8.13W 2.5x lower typical power consumption
Newer Jan, 2015 vs Oct, 2013 Release date over 1 years later
Lower annual home energy cost 0.96 $/year vs 2.41 $/year 2.5x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 3.5 $/year vs 8.76 $/year 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.04 GHz More than 90% higher clock speed
Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 320 MHz Around 2.2x higher GPU clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 2.42 GHz vs 2.08 GHz More than 15% higher turbo clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz vs 1.04 GHz More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better performance per dollar 0.52 pt/$ vs 0.43 pt/$ More than 20% better performance per dollar
Slightly better PassMark score 1,863 vs 917 More than 2x better PassMark score
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 1.04 GHz More than 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3000 vs J1900

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N3000  vs
J1900 
Clock speed 1.04 GHz 2 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.08 GHz 2.42 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 3 2
GPU clock speed 320 MHz 688 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 25,600 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB

details

Celeron N3000  vs
J1900 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 14 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.04 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.04 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.04 GHz 2.42 GHz

power consumption

TDP 4W 10W
Annual home energy cost 0.96 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 3.5 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 11.42 pt/W 4.27 pt/W
Typical power consumption 3.25W 8.13W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron N3000
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus