Intel Celeron N3000 vs J1850 |
Released January, 2015
Intel Celeron N3000
- 1.04 GHz
- Dual core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron N3000
 | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm | | Much better performance per watt 11.42 pt/W |
| | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core | | More number of displays supported 3 |
VS
Released July, 2013
Intel Celeron J1850
- 2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the J1850
| | Significantly higher clock speed 2 GHz | | Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz |
| | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2 GHz | | More cores 4 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better performance per watt | 11.42 pt/W | vs | 5.8 pt/W | More than 95% better performance per watt | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 3.25W | vs | 8.13W | 2.5x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Newer | Jan, 2015 | vs | Jul, 2013 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 0.96 $/year | vs | 2.41 $/year | 2.5x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 3.5 $/year | vs | 8.76 $/year | 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.04 GHz | More than 90% higher clock speed | |||
| Much higher GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | vs | 320 MHz | Around 2.2x higher GPU clock speed | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2 GHz | vs | 1.04 GHz | More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Significantly better performance per dollar | 0.71 pt/$ | vs | 0.43 pt/$ | More than 65% better performance per dollar | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | vs | 1.04 GHz | More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N3000 vs J1850
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron N3000 | vs | J1850 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.04 GHz | 2 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | 320 MHz | 688 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB | |
details | Celeron N3000 | vs | J1850 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.04 GHz | 2 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.04 GHz | 2 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.04 GHz | 2 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 4W | 10W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 0.96 $/year | 2.41 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 3.5 $/year | 8.76 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 11.42 pt/W | 5.8 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 3.25W | 8.13W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel Celeron N3000  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron J1850 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $107 | $107 | |
| Intel Celeron N3150 vs N3000 | ||
 | VS | |
| $82 | $107 | |
| Intel Celeron J1900 vs N3000 | ||
 | VS | |
| $315 | $107 | |
| Intel Core i5 5250U vs Celeron N3000 | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | $107 | |
| Intel Core i3 5010U vs Celeron N3000 | ||
 | VS | |
| $393 | $107 | |
| Intel Core i7 6500U vs Celeron N3000 | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | $107 | |
| Intel Celeron N3050 vs N3000 | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | ||
| Intel J3160 vs Celeron N3000 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
