Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N2940

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2940

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Higher GPU clock speed 313 MHz vs 200 MHz More than 55% higher GPU clock speed
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 6.09W vs 12.19W 2x lower typical power consumption
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Newer Jul, 2014 vs Jan, 2014 Release date 6 months later
Lower annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year vs 3.61 $/year 2x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 6.57 $/year vs 13.14 $/year 2x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron 3558U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 3558U

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 27.7 vs 23 More than 20% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Significantly better turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 854 MHz More than 15% better turbo clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N2940 vs 3558U

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N2940  vs
3558U 
Clock speed 1.83 GHz 1.7 GHz
Cores Quad core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 25,600 MB/s

details

Celeron N2940  vs
3558U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 2
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics HD
GPU clock speed 313 MHz 200 MHz
Turbo clock speed 854 MHz 1,000 MHz

power consumption

TDP 7.5W 15W
Annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year 3.61 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 6.57 $/year 13.14 $/year
Typical power consumption 6.09W 12.19W
Intel Celeron N2940
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 3558U
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus