CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N2930 vs J1900 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

8

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron N2930 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron N2930  based on its power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron N2930

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Celeron N2930

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N2930

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2930

Report a correction
Much better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 1.17 mPixels/s vs 0.39 mPixels/s Around 3x better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score
Better performance per watt 7.05 pt/W vs 4.27 pt/W More than 65% better performance per watt
Newer Feb, 2014 vs Oct, 2013 Release date 4 months later
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 56,900 MB/s vs 50,800 MB/s More than 10% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz vs 313 MHz Around 2.2x higher GPU clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 2.42 GHz vs 2.17 GHz More than 10% higher turbo clock speed
Slightly higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.83 GHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.42 GHz vs 2.16 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better performance per dollar 0.52 pt/$ vs 0.44 pt/$ More than 15% better performance per dollar
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.42 GHz vs 2.16 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N2930 vs J1900

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron N2930
1.58 mHash/s
Celeron J1900
1.78 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Celeron N2930
1.17 mPixels/s
Celeron J1900
0.39 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron N2930
0.13 fps
Celeron J1900
-1 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N2930
50,800 MB/s
Celeron J1900
56,900 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N2930  vs
J1900 
Clock speed 1.83 GHz 2 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.17 GHz 2.42 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 2 2
GPU clock speed 313 MHz 688 MHz
Turbo clock speed 854 MHz 854 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 8,192 MB

details

Celeron N2930  vs
J1900 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.16 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.16 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.16 GHz 2.42 GHz

power consumption

TDP 7.5W 10W
Annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 6.57 $/year 8.76 $/year
Performance per watt 7.05 pt/W 4.27 pt/W
Typical power consumption 6.09W 8.13W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron N2930
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
Daddy like!
comments powered by Disqus