0 Comments
| Intel Celeron N2930 vs 3765U |
Released February, 2014
Intel Celeron N2930
- 1.83 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron N2930
![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | More cores 4 |
![]() | More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core | ![]() | Lower typical power consumption 6.09W |
VS
Released April, 2015
Intel Celeron 3765U
- 1.9 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the 3765U
![]() | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm | ![]() | Much better performance per dollar 0.96 pt/$ |
![]() | Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score 1,092 | ![]() | More number of displays supported 3 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | Intel Celeron 3765UCPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Lower typical power consumption | 6.09W | vs | 12.19W | 2x lower typical power consumption | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.16 GHz | vs | 1.9 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 1.81 $/year | vs | 3.61 $/year | 2x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 6.57 $/year | vs | 13.14 $/year | 2x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.16 GHz | vs | 1.9 GHz | Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 0.96 pt/$ | vs | 0.44 pt/$ | Around 2.2x better performance per dollar | |||
Significantly better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,092 | vs | 465 | More than 2.2x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
Newer | Apr, 2015 | vs | Feb, 2014 | Release date over 1 years later |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N2930 vs 3765U
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron N2930
1,638
Celeron 3765U
2,042
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron N2930
465
Celeron 3765U
1,092
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron N2930 | vs | 3765U |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.83 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 7.5W | 15W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.81 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 6.57 $/year | 13.14 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 7.05 pt/W | 6.87 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 6.09W | 12.19W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI 2.0 | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Celeron N2930 | vs | 3765U |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 4 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 14 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.16 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.16 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 313 MHz | 300 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 854 MHz | 850 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 16,384 MB |
Intel Celeron N2930 ![]() | Intel Celeron 3765U ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$145 | ||
N2930 vs 4200+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$145 | $281 | |
N2930 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$145 | $82 | |
N2930 vs J1900 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$145 | $225 | |
N2930 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$145 | $107 | |
N2930 vs N2840 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$145 | $161 | |
N2930 vs N3530 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$145 | ||
N2930 vs N2830 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $50 | |
3220 vs 5300 | ||