Intel Celeron N2930 vs Atom E3825 |
Released February, 2014
Intel Celeron N2930
- 1.83 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron N2930
 | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom E3825 vs the Celeron N2930. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N2930 vs Atom E3825
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron N2930 | vs | Atom E3825 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.83 GHz | 1.33 GHz | |
| Cores | Quad core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| BGA 1170 | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 7.5W | 6W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.81 $/year | 1.45 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 7.05 pt/W | 4.24 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 6.09W | 4.88W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | Celeron N2930 | vs | Atom E3825 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 105°C | -40 - 110°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 1.33 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.16 GHz | 1.33 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.16 GHz | 1.33 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | HD | |
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | 313 MHz | 533 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| DDR3L-1066 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Single Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 6,400 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 8,192 MB | |
 Intel Celeron N2930  Report a correction |  Intel Atom E3825 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $155 | ||
| Intel Celeron N2930 vs AMD Athlon X2 4200+ | ||
| | VS |  |
| $155 | $281 | |
| Intel Celeron N2930 vs Core i5 4200U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $155 | $82 | |
| Intel Celeron N2930 vs J1900 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $155 | $225 | |
| Intel Celeron N2930 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $155 | $107 | |
| Intel Celeron N2930 vs N2840 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $155 | ||
| Intel Celeron N2930 vs N2830 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $155 | $52 | |
| Intel Celeron N2930 vs Atom E3845 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||
 | VS | |
| $134 | $225 | |
| Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
