Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N2920

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2920

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Front view of Intel Celeron M 722

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 722

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 722 vs the Celeron N2920.

Features Key features of the Celeron N2920  vs M 722 

clock speed

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N2920  vs
M 722 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.2 GHz
Cores Quad core Single core
Socket type
BGA 1170
BGA 956

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Celeron N2920  vs
M 722 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 1
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 756 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 844 MHz N/A

power consumption

TDP 7.5W 5.5W
Annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year 1.32 $/year
Typical power consumption 6.09W 4.47W
Intel Celeron N2920
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 722
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus