Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Atom Z3770

Intel Atom Z3770

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N2910

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2910

Report a correction
Slightly higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1.46 GHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.6 GHz vs 1.47 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Slightly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz vs 1.47 GHz Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Atom Z3770

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z3770

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 393,800 MB/s vs 37,600 MB/s Around 10.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 28.9 vs 10.9 Around 2.8x better 3DMark06 CPU score
Much better performance per dollar 5.01 pt/$ vs 0.39 pt/$ More than 12.8x better performance per dollar
Much better performance per watt 46.34 pt/W vs 5.6 pt/W More than 8.2x better performance per watt
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,827 vs 2,038 Around 40% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 2,995 vs 2,094 Around 45% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N2910 vs Atom Z3770

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N2910
37,600 MB/s
Atom Z3770
393,800 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N2910  vs
Atom Z3770 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.46 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 7.5W 4W
Annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year 0.96 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 6.57 $/year 3.5 $/year
Performance per watt 5.6 pt/W 46.34 pt/W
Typical power consumption 6.09W 3.25W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Celeron N2910  vs
Atom Z3770 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.47 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.47 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.6 GHz 1.47 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
GPU clock speed 313 MHz 311 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 17,066.66 MB/s
Maximum memory size 9,000.96 MB 4,096 MB
Intel Celeron N2910
Report a correction
Intel Atom Z3770
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus