Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Atom Z3735F

Intel Atom Z3735F

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N2910

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2910

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1.6 GHz vs 1.33 GHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Better turbo clock speed 756 MHz vs 646 MHz More than 15% better turbo clock speed
Front view of Intel Atom Z3735F

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z3735F

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 279,850 MB/s vs 37,600 MB/s Around 7.5x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 21.3 vs 10.9 More than 95% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Much better performance per dollar 7.87 pt/$ vs 0.39 pt/$ More than 20x better performance per dollar
Much better performance per watt 60.81 pt/W vs 5.6 pt/W More than 10.8x better performance per watt
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,095 vs 2,038 Around 5% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Slightly lower typical power consumption 1.79W vs 6.09W 3.4x lower typical power consumption
Newer Apr, 2014 vs Jul, 2013 Release date 9 months later
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.83 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 1.93 $/year vs 6.57 $/year 3.4x lower annual commercial energy cost
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 0.53 $/year vs 1.81 $/year 3.4x lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N2910 vs Atom Z3735F

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N2910
37,600 MB/s
Atom Z3735F
279,850 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N2910  vs
Atom Z3735F 
Clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.33 GHz
Cores Quad core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 7.5W 2.2W
Annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year 0.53 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 6.57 $/year 1.93 $/year
Performance per watt 5.6 pt/W 60.81 pt/W
Typical power consumption 6.09W 1.79W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Celeron N2910  vs
Atom Z3735F 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 4 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 1.6 GHz 1.63 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.6 GHz 1.83 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 1.6 GHz 1.63 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
GPU clock speed 313 MHz 311 MHz
Turbo clock speed 756 MHz 646 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3L-1333
DDR3RS-1333
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 6,400 MB/s
Maximum memory size 9,000.96 MB 2,048 MB
Intel Celeron N2910
Report a correction
Intel Atom Z3735F
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus