Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N2840

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2840

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Front view of Intel Celeron M 550

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 550

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 550 vs the Celeron N2840.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N2840 vs M 550

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N2840  vs
M 550 
Clock speed 2.16 GHz 0.55 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 311 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 792 MHz N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Celeron N2840  vs
M 550 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.13 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.13 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 180 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.58 GHz 2.27 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.17 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz 2.27 GHz

power consumption

TDP 7.5W 4W
Annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year 0.96 $/year
Typical power consumption 6.09W 3.25W
Intel Celeron N2840
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 550
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus