Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N2840

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2840

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Front view of Intel Celeron 3558U

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 3558U

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 3558U vs the N2840.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N2840 vs 3558U

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N2840  vs
3558U 
Clock speed 2.16 GHz 1.7 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 7.5W 15W
Annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year 3.61 $/year
Typical power consumption 6.09W 12.19W

details

Celeron N2840  vs
3558U 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics HD
GPU clock speed 311 MHz 200 MHz
Turbo clock speed 792 MHz 1,000 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1600
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 25,600 MB/s
Intel Celeron N2840
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 3558U
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus