Intel Celeron N2840 vs Atom Z3735F

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2840

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron N2840 vs the Atom Z3735F.

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z3735F

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom Z3735F vs the Celeron N2840.

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N2840

1,649

Atom Z3735F

2,148

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N2840

943

Atom Z3735F

778

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N2840

60,300 MB/s

Atom Z3735F

279,850 MB/s

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Celeron N2840

12.9

Atom Z3735F

21.3

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Celeron N2840

1,011

Atom Z3735F

908

PassMark (Single Core)

Celeron N2840

552

Atom Z3735F

350

summary	Celeron N2840	Atom Z3735F
Clock speed	2.16 GHz	1.33 GHz
Turbo clock speed	2.58 GHz	1.83 GHz
Cores	Dual core	Quad core
Is unlocked	No	No
features
Has a NX bit	Yes	Yes
Has virtualization support	Yes	Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling	Yes	Yes
integrated graphics
GPU	GPU	GPU
Label	Intel® HD Graphics	Intel® HD Graphics
GPU clock speed	311 MHz	311 MHz
Turbo clock speed	792 MHz	646 MHz
memory controller
Memory controller	Built-in	Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3L-1333
DDR3RS-1333
Channels	Dual Channel	Single Channel
Supports ECC	No	No
Maximum bandwidth	12,800 MB/s	6,400 MB/s
Maximum memory size	8,192 MB	2,048 MB

details	Celeron N2840	Atom Z3735F
Architecture	x86-64	x86-64
Threads	2	4
L2 cache	1 MB	2 MB
L2 cache per core	0.5 MB/core	0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process	22 nm	22 nm
Max CPUs	1	1
overclocking
Overclocked clock speed	2.58 GHz	1.63 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water)	2.17 GHz	1.83 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air)	2.58 GHz	1.63 GHz
power consumption
TDP	7.5W	2.2W
Annual home energy cost	1.81 $/year	0.53 $/year
Performance per watt	7.05 pt/W	60.81 pt/W
Typical power consumption	6.09W	1.79W
bus
Architecture	FSB	FSB
Number of links	1	1

Intel Celeron N2840

Report a correction

Intel Atom Z3735F

Report a correction

Intel Core i3 4010U vs Celeron N2840

Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300 vs Z3735F

Comments

Showing 4 comments.

Nextum (05:17 PM, July 21, 2016)

Celeron sucks like the jews

Plop (04:11 AM, December 24, 2015)

The z3735f can give you 12 hrs batter life in a ultraportable that can run a browser, office and csgo at ~15 fps, the celeron n2840 will give you 6 hrs battery life in an ultraportable that runs a browser, office and csgo at ~20 fps, the atom z3735f is a smart choice in this bracket.

Guest (03:48 AM, October 12, 2015)

I know the Atom Z3735F would be better in smaller devices, but the fact the Celeron N2840 only consumes 7.5 watts as it is.. I know which of the two I'd prefer to be using.

reda zaher (06:39 PM, May 11, 2015)

	VS
$281		$107
Intel Core i3 4010U vs Celeron N2840

	VS
$107		$107
Intel Celeron N3050 vs N2840

	VS
$161		$107
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Celeron N2840

	VS
		$107
Intel Celeron N2830 vs N2840

	VS
$21		$17
Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300 vs Z3735F

	VS
$107		$17
Intel Celeron N3050 vs Atom Z3735F

	VS
$32		$17
Intel Atom Z3740 vs Z3735F

	VS
$300		$305
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520

	VS
$350		$272
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K

	VS
		$281
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U

	VS
		$281
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U

	VS
$161		$275
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U

	VS
$230		$248
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K

	VS
$350		$250
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K

Intel Celeron N2840 vs Atom Z3735F