Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N2840

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2840

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Front view of AMD Phenom II N930

Reasons to consider the
AMD Phenom II N930

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Phenom II N930 vs the Intel Celeron N2840.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N2840 vs Phenom II N930

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N2840
60,300 MB/s
Phenom II N930
79,150 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N2840  vs
Phenom II N930 
Clock speed 2.16 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 311 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 792 MHz N/A

details

Celeron N2840  vs
Phenom II N930 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.13 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.58 GHz 2.02 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.17 GHz 2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.58 GHz 2.02 GHz

power consumption

TDP 7.5W 35W
Annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 7.05 pt/W 2.74 pt/W
Typical power consumption 6.09W 28.44W
Intel Celeron N2840
Report a correction
AMD Phenom II N930
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus