0 Comments
| Intel Celeron N2840 vs AMD E1 for AIOs 7010 |
Released July, 2014
Intel Celeron N2840
- 2.16 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron N2840
![]() | Significantly higher turbo clock speed 2.58 GHz | ![]() | Higher clock speed 2.16 GHz |
![]() | Newer manufacturing process 22 nm |
VS
First seen on January, 2016
AMD E1 for AIOs 7010
- 1.5 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD E1 for AIOs 7010
![]() | Higher GPU clock speed 400 MHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 2.58 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | More than 70% higher turbo clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 2.16 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | Around 45% higher clock speed | |||
Newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 28 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| |||||||
Higher GPU clock speed | 400 MHz | vs | 311 MHz | Around 30% higher GPU clock speed |
Features Key features of the Celeron N2840 vs E1 for AIOs 7010
clock speed
Celeron N2840
2.16 GHz
E1 for AIOs 7010
1.5 GHz
turbo clock speed
Celeron N2840
2.58 GHz
E1 for AIOs 7010
1.5 GHz
L2 cache
Celeron N2840
1 MB
E1 for AIOs 7010
1 MB
gpu clock speed
Celeron N2840
311 MHz
E1 for AIOs 7010
400 MHz
TDP
Celeron N2840
7.5W
E1 for AIOs 7010
10W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron N2840 | vs | E1 for AIOs 7010 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.58 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 7.5W | 10W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.81 $/year | 2.41 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 6.57 $/year | 8.76 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 6.09W | 8.13W |
details | Celeron N2840 | vs | E1 for AIOs 7010 |
---|---|---|---|
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 28 nm | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Radeon™ R2 | |
GPU clock speed | 311 MHz | 400 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR3L-1333 |
Intel Celeron N2840 ![]() | AMD E1 for AIOs 7010 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $107 | |
4010U vs N2840 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | $107 | |
N3050 vs N2840 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $107 | |
N3540 vs N2840 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | $107 | |
Z3735F vs N2840 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | ||
N2830 vs N2840 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | ||
6010 vs N2840 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $107 | |
4005U vs N2840 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||