Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N2840

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2840

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Higher clock speed 2.16 GHz vs 1.92 GHz Around 15% higher clock speed
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of AMD Athlon XP 2600+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon XP 2600+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon XP 2600+ vs the Intel Celeron N2840.

Features Key features of the Celeron N2840  vs Athlon XP 2600+ 

clock speed

Celeron N2840
2.16 GHz
Athlon XP 2600+
1.92 GHz

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N2840  vs
Athlon XP 2600+ 
Clock speed 2.16 GHz 1.92 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features

Has a NX bit Yes No

details

Celeron N2840  vs
Athlon XP 2600+ 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 6.09W N/A
Intel Celeron N2840
Report a correction
AMD Athlon XP 2600+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus