Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N2840

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2840

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Front view of AMD Athlon Neo 40

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon Neo 40

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon Neo 40 vs the Intel Celeron N2840.

Features Key features of the Celeron N2840  vs Athlon Neo 40 

clock speed

Celeron N2840
2.16 GHz
Athlon Neo 40
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N2840  vs
Athlon Neo 40 
Clock speed 2.16 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 7.5W 15W
Annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year 3.61 $/year
Typical power consumption 6.09W 12.19W

details

Celeron N2840  vs
Athlon Neo 40 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 311 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 792 MHz N/A
Intel Celeron N2840
Report a correction
AMD Athlon Neo 40
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus