0 Comments
| Intel Celeron N2830 vs 1005M |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the N2830 vs the 1005M. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 1005M vs the N2830. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N2830 vs 1005M
CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench
Celeron N2830
1.57 mHash/s
Celeron 1005M
3.35 mHash/s
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
Celeron N2830
1.08 mPixels/s
Celeron 1005M
4.1 mPixels/s
CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench
Celeron N2830
0.12 fps
Celeron 1005M
0.44 fps
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron N2830
1,514
Celeron 1005M
2,620
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron N2830
891
Celeron 1005M
1,511
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron N2830
56,100 MB/s
Celeron 1005M
99,700 MB/s
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron N2830
954
Celeron 1005M
1,844
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron N2830
510
Celeron 1005M
1,006
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron N2830 | vs | 1005M |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
F16C | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 7.5W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.81 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 6 pt/W | 2.55 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 6.09W | 28.44W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Celeron N2830 | vs | 1005M |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 105°C | Unknown - 105°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.17 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.4 GHz | 1.9 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | 2 | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | 313 MHz | 650 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 750 MHz | 1,000 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3-1600 | |||
DDR3L-1600 | |||
DDR3-1333 | |||
DDR3L-1333 | |||
DDR3RS-1600 | |||
DDR3RS-1333 | |||
Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 12,800 MB/s | 25,600 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 8,192 MB | 32,768 MB |
Intel Celeron N2830 ![]() | Intel Celeron 1005M ![]() |
Laptops
Looking for a laptop?
- 19 laptops with the Intel Celeron N2830, starting from $170
- 2 laptops with the Intel Celeron 1005M, starting from $437
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | ||
N2830 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$107 | ||
N2830 vs N2840 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | ||
N2830 vs N3530 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
N2830 vs 6010 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
N2830 vs Z3775 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
N2830 vs 2100 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $225 | |
1005M vs 380M | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
847 vs 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
3470 vs 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 5 comments.
Heinrich Grobler (09:01 AM, January 21, 2016)
Goran Dimov (01:32 PM, November 24, 2015)
precise (04:17 PM, November 29, 2014)
Victor (10:04 AM, October 23, 2014)
kira (10:39 AM, August 11, 2014)