Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron N2830

Front view of Intel Celeron N2830
Front view of Intel Atom Z3775

Intel Atom Z3775

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N2830

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2830

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron N2830 vs the Atom Z3775.
Front view of Intel Atom Z3775

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z3775

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom Z3775 vs the Celeron N2830.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N2830 vs Atom Z3775

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N2830
1,514
Atom Z3775
3,046

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N2830
891
Atom Z3775
957

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N2830
56,100 MB/s
Atom Z3775
381,000 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N2830
1,446
Atom Z3775
2,989

GeekBench

Celeron N2830
1,648
Atom Z3775
2,989

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Celeron N2830
11.7
Atom Z3775
25.6

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Celeron N2830
954
Atom Z3775
1,259

PassMark (Single Core)

Celeron N2830
510
Atom Z3775
488

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Celeron N2830  vs
Atom Z3775 
Clock speed 2.16 GHz 1.47 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.41 GHz 2.39 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
BGA 1170
BGA 1380
Is unlocked No No

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption
TDP 7.5W 2W
Annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year 0.48 $/year
Performance per watt 6 pt/W 90.91 pt/W
Typical power consumption 6.09W 1.63W

bus
Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

 Celeron N2830  vs
Atom Z3775 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 0.4 - 1.14V 0.4 - 1.14V
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C Unknown - 90°C

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 2.4 GHz 2.27 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.17 GHz 1.47 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz 2.27 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
GPU clock speed 313 MHz 311 MHz
Turbo clock speed 750 MHz 667 MHz

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1066
DDR3L-1333
DDR3
Channels Dual Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 17,066.66 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 4,096 MB
Intel Celeron N2830
Report a correction
Intel Atom Z3775
Report a correction

Comments

Showing 2 comments.
simas sim (06:19 AM, December 31, 2016)
agree ass but neither is goot actually thats like comparing 2x crap and deciding which smells more
ass 5 (03:35 PM, June 4, 2016)
celeron is much faster u idiots
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss