Intel Celeron N2830 vs Atom N270 |
Released February, 2014
Intel Celeron N2830
- 2.16 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron N2830
 | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Has virtualization support Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom N270 vs the Celeron N2830. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N2830 vs Atom N270
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron N2830 | vs | Atom N270 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| BGA 1170 | |||
| 437 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 7.5W | 2.5W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.81 $/year | 0.6 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 6 pt/W | 9.71 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 6.09W | 2.03W | |
details | Celeron N2830 | vs | Atom N270 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 45 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Voltage range | 0.4 - 1.14V | 0.9 - 1.16V | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.4 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.17 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.4 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | None | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | 2 | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | 313 MHz | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | 750 MHz | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel Celeron N2830  Report a correction |  Intel Atom N270 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||
