Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N2830

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2830

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Higher clock speed 2.16 GHz vs 1.6 GHz 35% higher clock speed
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of AMD Opteron 242

Reasons to consider the
AMD Opteron 242

Report a correction
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 2 vs 1 Twice as many CPUs in SMP configuration
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 0.81W vs 6.09W 7.5x lower typical power consumption
Lower annual commercial energy cost 0.88 $/year vs 6.57 $/year 7.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Lower annual home energy cost 0.24 $/year vs 1.81 $/year 7.5x lower annual home energy cost

Features Key features of the Celeron N2830  vs Opteron 242 

clock speed

Celeron N2830
2.16 GHz
Opteron 242
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N2830  vs
Opteron 242 
Clock speed 2.16 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
BGA 1170
940

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
AES

details

Celeron N2830  vs
Opteron 242 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 2

power consumption

TDP 7.5W 1W
Annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year 0.24 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 6.57 $/year 0.88 $/year
Typical power consumption 6.09W 0.81W
Intel Celeron N2830
Report a correction
AMD Opteron 242
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus