CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N2830 vs 2100 among laptop CPUs (up to 15W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.3

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron N2830 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron N2830  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N2830

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2830

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Celeron N2830 vs the AMD E1 2100.

Front view of AMD E1 2100

Reasons to consider the
AMD E1 2100

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD E1 2100 vs the Intel Celeron N2830.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N2830 vs E1 2100

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron N2830
1.57 mHash/s
E1 2100
9.64 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Ocean surface simulation) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron N2830
6.63 fps
E1 2100
60.55 fps

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron N2830
0.12 fps
E1 2100
0.24 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N2830
56,100 MB/s
E1 2100
494,700 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N2830  vs
E1 2100 
Clock speed 2.16 GHz 1 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.41 GHz None
Cores Dual core Dual core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
F16C
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
BMI1
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 7.5W 9W
Annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year 2.17 $/year
Performance per watt 6 pt/W 16.08 pt/W
Typical power consumption 6.09W 7.31W

details

Celeron N2830  vs
E1 2100 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C Unknown - 90°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.4 GHz 1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.17 GHz 1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.4 GHz 1 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon™ HD 8210
GPU clock speed 313 MHz 300 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3L-1333
Intel Celeron N2830
Report a correction
AMD E1 2100
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus