Intel Celeron N2830 vs AMD Athlon 64 FX 53 |
Released February, 2014
Intel Celeron N2830
- 2.16 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron N2830
 | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | Much lower typical power consumption 6.09W |
| | Newer Feb, 2014 | | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C |
VS
Released March, 2004
AMD Athlon 64 FX 53
- 2.4 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Athlon 64 FX 53
| | Higher clock speed 2.4 GHz | | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 130 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much lower typical power consumption | 6.09W | vs | 72.31W | 11.9x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Newer | Feb, 2014 | vs | Mar, 2004 | Release date over 10 years later | |||
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 105 °C | vs | 70 °C | 50% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 1.81 $/year | vs | 21.44 $/year | 11.9x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 6.57 $/year | vs | 77.96 $/year | 11.9x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 2.4 GHz | vs | 2.16 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Celeron N2830 vs Athlon 64 FX 53
clock speed
L2 cache
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron N2830 | vs | Athlon 64 FX 53 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.16 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| BGA 1170 | |||
| 940 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| F16C | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| AES | |||
details | Celeron N2830 | vs | Athlon 64 FX 53 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 2 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 130 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 105°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 7.5W | 89W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.81 $/year | 21.44 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 6.57 $/year | 77.96 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 6.09W | 72.31W | |
 Intel Celeron N2830  Report a correction |  AMD Athlon 64 FX 53 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
