CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N2815 vs 3400M among laptop CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

6

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
AMD A6 3400M 

CPUBoss recommends the AMD A6 3400M  based on its features.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N2815

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2815

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Celeron N2815 vs the AMD A6 3400M.

Front view of AMD A6 3400M

Reasons to consider the
AMD A6 3400M

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD A6 3400M vs the Intel Celeron N2815.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N2815 vs A6 3400M

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron N2815
1.35 mHash/s
A6 3400M
24.16 mHash/s

CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)

Celeron N2815
0.95 mPixels/s
A6 3400M
2.27 mPixels/s

CompuBench 1.5 (T-Rex) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron N2815
0.11 fps
A6 3400M
0.38 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A6 3400M
2,872

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N2815
49,200 MB/s
A6 3400M
68,700 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N2815  vs
A6 3400M 
Clock speed 1.86 GHz 1.4 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.13 GHz 1.4 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 7.5W 35W
Annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year 8.43 $/year
Performance per watt 5.56 pt/W 2.92 pt/W
Typical power consumption 6.09W 28.44W

details

Celeron N2815  vs
A6 3400M 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 4 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.13 GHz 2.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.87 GHz 1.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.13 GHz 2.69 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon™ HD 6520G
GPU clock speed 844 MHz 400 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3L-1066
Intel Celeron N2815
Report a correction
AMD A6 3400M
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus