Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of Intel Atom Z3735F

Intel Atom Z3735F

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N2810

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2810

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.33 GHz More than 50% higher clock speed
Better turbo clock speed 756 MHz vs 646 MHz More than 15% better turbo clock speed
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2 GHz vs 1.63 GHz Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Front view of Intel Atom Z3735F

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z3735F

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 279,850 MB/s vs 46,800 MB/s Around 6x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much better performance per dollar 7.87 pt/$ vs 0.47 pt/$ Around 17x better performance per dollar
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 21.3 vs 17.2 Around 25% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Much better performance per watt 60.81 pt/W vs 6.65 pt/W Around 9.2x better performance per watt
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,095 vs 1,244 Around 70% better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 2,148 vs 1,285 More than 65% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Slightly lower typical power consumption 1.79W vs 6.09W 3.4x lower typical power consumption
Newer Apr, 2014 vs Jul, 2013 Release date 9 months later
Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost 1.93 $/year vs 6.57 $/year 3.4x lower annual commercial energy cost
Slightly lower annual home energy cost 0.53 $/year vs 1.81 $/year 3.4x lower annual home energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N2810 vs Atom Z3735F

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N2810
46,800 MB/s
Atom Z3735F
279,850 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N2810  vs
Atom Z3735F 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.33 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
GPU clock speed 313 MHz 311 MHz
Turbo clock speed 756 MHz 646 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3L-1333
DDR3RS-1333
Channels Dual Channel Single Channel
Maximum bandwidth 12,800 MB/s 6,400 MB/s
Maximum memory size 8,192 MB 2,048 MB

details

Celeron N2810  vs
Atom Z3735F 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2 GHz 1.63 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 1.83 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2 GHz 1.63 GHz

power consumption

TDP 7.5W 2.2W
Annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year 0.53 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 6.57 $/year 1.93 $/year
Performance per watt 6.65 pt/W 60.81 pt/W
Typical power consumption 6.09W 1.79W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron N2810
Report a correction
Intel Atom Z3735F
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus