Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Celeron N2810

Front view of Intel Celeron N2810
Front view of AMD Athlon XP 1900+

AMD Athlon XP 1900+

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N2810

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2810

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.25 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
More l2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Front view of AMD Athlon XP 1900+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon XP 1900+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon XP 1900+ vs the Intel Celeron N2810.

Features Key features of the Celeron N2810  vs Athlon XP 1900+ 

clock speed

Celeron N2810
2 GHz
Athlon XP 1900+
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

Celeron N2810
1 MB
Athlon XP 1900+
0.25 MB

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Celeron N2810  vs
Athlon XP 1900+ 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core

features
Has a NX bit Yes No

details

 Celeron N2810  vs
Athlon XP 1900+ 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption
Typical power consumption 6.09W N/A
Intel Celeron N2810
Report a correction
AMD Athlon XP 1900+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss