Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of AMD A6 1450

AMD A6 1450

CPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N2810

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2810

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1 GHz 2x higher clock speed
Much better turbo clock speed 756 MHz vs 400 MHz Around 90% better turbo clock speed
Newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 28 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2 GHz vs 1.06 GHz Around 90% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz vs 1 GHz 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD A6 1450

Reasons to consider the
AMD A6 1450

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 639,700 MB/s vs 46,800 MB/s Around 13.8x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 21 vs 17.2 More than 20% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much better performance per watt 24.73 pt/W vs 6.65 pt/W Around 3.8x better performance per watt
More cores 4 vs 2 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 1,892 vs 1,285 More than 45% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N2810 vs A6 1450

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A6 1450
1,892

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N2810
46,800 MB/s
A6 1450
639,700 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

A6 1450
1,935

GeekBench

A6 1450
1,935

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N2810  vs
A6 1450 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon™ HD 8250
GPU clock speed 313 MHz 300 MHz
Turbo clock speed 756 MHz 400 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3L-1066

details

Celeron N2810  vs
A6 1450 
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 28 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2 GHz 1.06 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 1 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2 GHz 1.06 GHz

power consumption

TDP 7.5W 8W
Annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year 1.93 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 6.57 $/year 7.01 $/year
Performance per watt 6.65 pt/W 24.73 pt/W
Typical power consumption 6.09W 6.5W
Intel Celeron N2810
Report a correction
AMD A6 1450
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus