Intel Celeron N2807 vs J1900 |
Released February, 2014
Intel Celeron N2807
- 1.58 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron N2807
 | Much better performance per watt 11.49 pt/W | | Slightly lower typical power consumption 3.49W |
| | Newer Feb, 2014 | | Slightly lower annual home energy cost 1.04 $/year |
VS
Released October, 2013
Intel Celeron J1900
- 2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the J1900
| | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB | | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 56,900 MB/s |
| | Higher clock speed 2 GHz | | Much higher GPU clock speed 688 MHz |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Celeron N2807CPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better performance per watt | 11.49 pt/W | vs | 4.27 pt/W | Around 2.8x better performance per watt | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slightly lower typical power consumption | 3.49W | vs | 8.13W | 2.3x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Newer | Feb, 2014 | vs | Oct, 2013 | Release date 4 months later | |||
| Slightly lower annual home energy cost | 1.04 $/year | vs | 2.41 $/year | 2.3x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Slightly lower annual commercial energy cost | 3.77 $/year | vs | 8.76 $/year | 2.3x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 56,900 MB/s | vs | 50,900 MB/s | More than 10% better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 1.58 GHz | More than 25% higher clock speed | |||
| Much higher GPU clock speed | 688 MHz | vs | 313 MHz | Around 2.2x higher GPU clock speed | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 2.42 GHz | vs | 2.17 GHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Better turbo clock speed | 854 MHz | vs | 750 MHz | Around 15% better turbo clock speed | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Slightly better PassMark score | 1,863 | vs | 852 | Around 2.2x better PassMark score | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.42 GHz | vs | 2.17 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Slightly better performance per dollar | 0.52 pt/$ | vs | 0.46 pt/$ | Around 15% better performance per dollar | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.42 GHz | vs | 1.58 GHz | Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N2807 vs J1900
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron N2807 | vs | J1900 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.58 GHz | 2 GHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 2.17 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | 313 MHz | 688 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 750 MHz | 854 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Single Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 6,400 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 4,096 MB | 8,192 MB | |
details | Celeron N2807 | vs | J1900 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.17 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.58 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.17 GHz | 2.42 GHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 4.3W | 10W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.04 $/year | 2.41 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 3.77 $/year | 8.76 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 11.49 pt/W | 4.27 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 3.49W | 8.13W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel Celeron N2807  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron J1900 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $82 | |
| 3220 vs J1900 | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | $82 | |
| N3150 vs J1900 | ||
 | VS | |
| $72 | $82 | |
| J1800 vs J1900 | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | $82 | |
| 1037U vs J1900 | ||
 | VS | |
| $94 | $82 | |
| J2900 vs J1900 | ||
 | VS | |
| $82 | ||
| J3455 vs J1900 | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | $82 | |
| 1007U vs J1900 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| 6700K vs 6600K | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
