Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N2807

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2807

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 50,900 MB/s vs 78.4 MB/s Around 649.2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Significantly newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 32 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better performance per watt 11.49 pt/W vs 1.42 pt/W More than 8x better performance per watt
Significantly lower typical power consumption 3.49W vs 28.44W 8.1x lower typical power consumption
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.17 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Feb, 2014 vs Jun, 2011 Release date over 2 years later
Higher Maximum operating temperature 105 °C vs 100 °C 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 1.04 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 8.1x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 3.77 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 8.1x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron B810E

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron B810E

Report a correction
Much higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz vs 313 MHz More than 2x higher GPU clock speed
Much better turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 750 MHz Around 35% better turbo clock speed
Better performance per dollar 0.63 pt/$ vs 0.46 pt/$ More than 35% better performance per dollar
Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 2,097 vs 1,447 Around 45% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N2807 vs B810E

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N2807
50,900 MB/s
Celeron B810E
78.4 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N2807  vs
B810E 
Clock speed 1.58 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
BGA 1170
BGA 1023

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 4.3W 35W
Annual home energy cost 1.04 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 3.77 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 11.49 pt/W 1.42 pt/W
Typical power consumption 3.49W 28.44W

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1

details

Celeron N2807  vs
B810E 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C Unknown - 100°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.17 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.58 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.17 GHz 1.6 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported 2 2
GPU clock speed 313 MHz 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed 750 MHz 1,000 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3
Channels Single Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 6,400 MB/s 21,333.32 MB/s
Maximum memory size 4,096 MB 16,998.4 MB
Intel Celeron N2807
Report a correction
Intel Celeron B810E
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus