0 Comments
| Intel Celeron N2807 vs Atom Z3735G |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron N2807 vs the Atom Z3735G. | |||||||
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom Z3735G vs the Celeron N2807. | |||||||
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N2807 vs Atom Z3735G
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron N2807
1,447
Atom Z3735G
2,045
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron N2807
848
Atom Z3735G
717
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron N2807
50,900 MB/s
Atom Z3735G
279,100 MB/s
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Celeron N2807
17.4
Atom Z3735G
25.4
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron N2807
852
Atom Z3735G
909
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron N2807
441
Atom Z3735G
353
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron N2807 | vs | Atom Z3735G |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.58 GHz | 1.33 GHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 2.17 GHz | 1.58 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
BGA 1170 | |||
BGA 592 | |||
Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 4.3W | 2.2W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.04 $/year | 0.53 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 11.49 pt/W | 60.05 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 3.49W | 1.79W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Celeron N2807 | vs | Atom Z3735G |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Voltage range | 0.4 - 1.14V | 0.4 - 1.14V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 105°C | Unknown - 90°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.17 GHz | 1.83 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.58 GHz | 1.83 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.17 GHz | 1.83 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
GPU clock speed | 313 MHz | 311 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 750 MHz | 646 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3 | |||
Channels | Single Channel | Single Channel | |
Supports ECC | No | No | |
Maximum bandwidth | 6,400 MB/s | 6,400 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 4,096 MB | 1,024 MB |
Intel Celeron N2807 ![]() | Intel Atom Z3735G ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | $17 | |
Intel Atom Z3735F vs Z3735G | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$21 | $17 | |
Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300 vs Z3735G | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | $17 | |
Intel Atom Z3740 vs Z3735G | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | ||
Nvidia Tegra 4 vs Intel Atom Z3735G | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$52 | $107 | |
Intel Atom E3845 vs Celeron N2807 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$82 | $107 | |
Intel Celeron J1900 vs N2807 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | $107 | |
Intel Core i3 4010U vs Celeron N2807 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||