CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N2807 vs Z3735F among laptop CPUs (up to 15W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.6

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron N2807 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron N2807  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N2807

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2807

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron N2807 vs the Atom Z3735F.

Front view of Intel Atom Z3735F

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z3735F

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom Z3735F vs the Celeron N2807.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N2807 vs Atom Z3735F

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N2807
50,900 MB/s
Atom Z3735F
279,850 MB/s

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N2807  vs
Atom Z3735F 
Clock speed 1.58 GHz 1.33 GHz
Turbo clock speed 2.17 GHz 1.83 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
BGA 1170
BGA 592
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 4.3W 2.2W
Annual home energy cost 1.04 $/year 0.53 $/year
Performance per watt 11.49 pt/W 60.81 pt/W
Typical power consumption 3.49W 1.79W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Celeron N2807  vs
Atom Z3735F 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 0.4 - 1.14V 0.4 - 1.14V
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C Unknown - 90°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.17 GHz 1.63 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.58 GHz 1.83 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.17 GHz 1.63 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Intel® HD Graphics
GPU clock speed 313 MHz 311 MHz
Turbo clock speed 750 MHz 646 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3L-1333
DDR3RS-1333
Channels Single Channel Single Channel
Supports ECC No No
Maximum bandwidth 6,400 MB/s 6,400 MB/s
Maximum memory size 4,096 MB 2,048 MB
Intel Celeron N2807
Report a correction
Intel Atom Z3735F
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus