CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of N2807 vs E3845 among laptop CPUs (up to 15W)

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

5.7

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Celeron N2807 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Celeron N2807  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron N2807

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N2807

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Front view of Intel Atom E3845

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom E3845

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom E3845 vs the Celeron N2807.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N2807 vs Atom E3845

CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition) Data courtesy CompuBench

Celeron N2807
0.22 fps
Atom E3845
1.91 fps

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Celeron N2807
50,900 MB/s
Atom E3845
317,450 MB/s

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

PassMark (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron N2807  vs
Atom E3845 
Clock speed 1.58 GHz 1.91 GHz
Cores Dual core Quad core
Socket type
BGA 1170
Is unlocked No No

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 4.3W 10W
Annual home energy cost 1.04 $/year 2.41 $/year
Performance per watt 11.49 pt/W 11.4 pt/W
Typical power consumption 3.49W 8.13W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Celeron N2807  vs
Atom E3845 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 22 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 105°C -40 - 110°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.17 GHz 1.92 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 1.58 GHz 1.91 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.17 GHz 1.92 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics HD
Number of displays supported 2 2
GPU clock speed 313 MHz 542 MHz
Turbo clock speed 750 MHz 792 MHz

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3
DDR3L-1333
Channels Single Channel Dual Channel
Supports ECC No Yes
Maximum bandwidth 6,400 MB/s 12,800 MB/s
Maximum memory size 4,096 MB 8,192 MB
Intel Celeron N2807
Report a correction
Intel Atom E3845
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus