Intel Celeron N2807 vs Atom E3845 |
Released February, 2014
Intel Celeron N2807
- 1.58 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron N2807
 | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Atom E3845 vs the Celeron N2807. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N2807 vs Atom E3845
CompuBench 1.5 (Video composition) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron N2807 | vs | Atom E3845 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.58 GHz | 1.91 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| BGA 1170 | |||
| Is unlocked | No | No | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 4.3W | 10W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.04 $/year | 2.41 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 11.49 pt/W | 11.4 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 3.49W | 8.13W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | Celeron N2807 | vs | Atom E3845 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 105°C | -40 - 110°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.17 GHz | 1.92 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.58 GHz | 1.91 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.17 GHz | 1.92 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics | HD | |
| Number of displays supported | 2 | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | 313 MHz | 542 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 750 MHz | 792 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| DDR3L-1333 | |||
| Channels | Single Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | Yes | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 6,400 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 4,096 MB | 8,192 MB | |
 Intel Celeron N2807  Report a correction |  Intel Atom E3845 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $82 | $52 | |
| Intel Celeron J1900 vs Atom E3845 | ||
 | VS | |
| $52 | ||
| Intel J3160 vs Atom E3845 | ||
 | VS | |
| $52 | ||
| Intel E3940 vs Atom E3845 | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | $52 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Atom E3845 | ||
 | VS | |
| $52 | ||
| Intel E3950 vs Atom E3845 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $82 | $107 | |
| Intel Celeron J1900 vs N2807 | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | $107 | |
| Intel Core i3 4010U vs Celeron N2807 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $50 | $125 | |
| AMD A4 5300 vs Intel Core i3 3220 | ||
