0 Comments
| Intel Celeron N2805 vs Atom Z3735F |
Released July, 2013
Intel Celeron N2805
- 1.46 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron N2805
![]() | Slightly higher clock speed 1.46 GHz | ![]() | Slightly better turbo clock speed 667 MHz |
VS
Released April, 2014
Intel Atom Z3735F
- 1.33 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Atom Z3735F
![]() | Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 279,850 MB/s | ![]() | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 21.3 |
![]() | Much better performance per dollar 7.87 pt/$ | ![]() | Much better performance per watt 60.81 pt/W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
| ![]() | Intel Atom Z3735FCPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Slightly higher clock speed | 1.46 GHz | vs | 1.33 GHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Slightly better turbo clock speed | 667 MHz | vs | 646 MHz | Around 5% better turbo clock speed | |||
| |||||||
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score | 279,850 MB/s | vs | 34,400 MB/s | Around 8.2x better geekbench 3 AES single core score | |||
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 21.3 | vs | 16.7 | Around 30% better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
Much better performance per dollar | 7.87 pt/$ | vs | 0.34 pt/$ | More than 23x better performance per dollar | |||
Much better performance per watt | 60.81 pt/W | vs | 8.49 pt/W | Around 7.2x better performance per watt | |||
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | 2,095 | vs | 984 | Around 2.2x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score | |||
Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Newer | Apr, 2014 | vs | Jul, 2013 | Release date 9 months later | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.83 GHz | vs | 1.46 GHz | More than 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron N2805 vs Atom Z3735F
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron N2805
1,009
Atom Z3735F
2,148
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron N2805
601
Atom Z3735F
778
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron N2805
34,400 MB/s
Atom Z3735F
279,850 MB/s
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Celeron N2805
984
Atom Z3735F
2,095
GeekBench
Celeron N2805
984
Atom Z3735F
2,095
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Celeron N2805
16.7
Atom Z3735F
21.3
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
Celeron N2805
453
Atom Z3735F
908
PassMark (Single Core)
Celeron N2805
290
Atom Z3735F
350
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron N2805 | vs | Atom Z3735F |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.46 GHz | 1.33 GHz | |
Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 4.3W | 2.2W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.04 $/year | 0.53 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 3.77 $/year | 1.93 $/year | |
Performance per watt | 8.49 pt/W | 60.81 pt/W | |
Typical power consumption | 3.49W | 1.79W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
details | Celeron N2805 | vs | Atom Z3735F |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 22 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 1.46 GHz | 1.63 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.46 GHz | 1.83 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.46 GHz | 1.63 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | GPU | GPU | |
Label | Intel® HD Graphics | Intel® HD Graphics | |
GPU clock speed | 313 MHz | 311 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 667 MHz | 646 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Memory type | |||
DDR3 | |||
DDR3L-1333 | |||
DDR3RS-1333 | |||
Channels | Single Channel | Single Channel | |
Maximum bandwidth | 6,400 MB/s | 6,400 MB/s | |
Maximum memory size | 4,096 MB | 2,048 MB |
Intel Celeron N2805 ![]() | Intel Atom Z3735F ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | $21 | |
Intel Atom Z3735F vs x5 x5-Z8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | $107 | |
Intel Atom Z3735F vs Celeron N2840 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | $107 | |
Intel Atom Z3735F vs Celeron N3050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | ||
Intel Atom Z3735F vs x5-Z8350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | $32 | |
Intel Atom Z3735F vs Z3740 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | $17 | |
Intel Atom Z3735F vs Z3735G | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | $20 | |
Intel Atom Z3735F vs Z3736F | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||