Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 722

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 722

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 722 vs the Atom E3825.

Front view of Intel Atom E3825

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom E3825

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines

Features Key features of the Celeron M 722  vs Atom E3825 

clock speed

Celeron M 722
1.2 GHz
Atom E3825
1.33 GHz

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 722  vs
Atom E3825 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 1.33 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Socket type
BGA 956
BGA 1170

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Celeron M 722  vs
Atom E3825 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A HD
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 533 MHz

power consumption

TDP 5.5W 6W
Annual home energy cost 1.32 $/year 1.45 $/year
Typical power consumption 4.47W 4.88W
Intel Celeron M 722
Report a correction
Intel Atom E3825
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus