Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 722

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 722

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 722 vs the Atom D525.

Front view of Intel Atom D525

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom D525

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required

Features Key features of the Celeron M 722  vs Atom D525 

clock speed

Celeron M 722
1.2 GHz
Atom D525
1.8 GHz

L2 cache

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 722  vs
Atom D525 
Clock speed 1.2 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1

details

Celeron M 722  vs
Atom D525 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 1 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 45 nm 45 nm
Transistor count 410,000,000 176,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Voltage range 0.78 - 1.1V 0.8 - 1.18V

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Integrated

power consumption

TDP 5.5W 13W
Annual home energy cost 1.32 $/year 3.13 $/year
Typical power consumption 4.47W 10.56W
Intel Celeron M 722
Report a correction
Intel Atom D525
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus