0 Comments
| Intel Celeron M 550 vs 440 |
Released September, 2007
Intel Celeron M 550
- 0.55 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Celeron M 550
![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 3.25W | ![]() | Newer Sep, 2007 |
![]() | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 0.96 $/year | ![]() | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 3.5 $/year |
VS
Released July, 2006
Intel Celeron M 440
- 2 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the 440
![]() | Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 980 | ![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm |
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2 GHz | ![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 3.25W | vs | 28.44W | 8.7x lower typical power consumption | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Newer | Sep, 2007 | vs | Jul, 2006 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 0.96 $/year | vs | 8.43 $/year | 8.8x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 3.5 $/year | vs | 30.66 $/year | 8.7x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score | 980 | vs | 877 | More than 10% better 3DMark06 CPU score | |||
Much newer manufacturing process | 65 nm | vs | 180 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Much higher clock speed | 2 GHz | vs | 0.55 GHz | Around 3.8x higher clock speed | |||
Significantly more l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.13 MB | Around 7.8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.13 MB/core | Around 7.8x more l2 cache per core | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.57 GHz | vs | 2.27 GHz | More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.98 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | Around 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water) |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 550 vs 440
3D Mark 06 (CPU)
Celeron M 550
877
Celeron M 440
980
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Celeron M 550 | vs | 440 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 0.55 GHz | 2 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
479 | |||
495 | |||
LGA 775 | |||
M | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 4W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 0.96 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 3.5 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 3.25W | 28.44W |
details | Celeron M 550 | vs | 440 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 1 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 0.13 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 0.13 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 180 nm | 65 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.27 GHz | 3.57 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | 3.98 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.27 GHz | 3.57 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 100 MHz | 800 MHz |
Intel Celeron M 550 ![]() | Intel Celeron M 440 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$48 | $163 | |
Intel Celeron M 440 vs Pentium D 945 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$48 | $44 | |
Intel Celeron M 440 vs E1200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$48 | $64 | |
Intel Celeron M 440 vs Atom N455 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$48 | $145 | |
Intel Celeron M 440 vs Core2 Duo E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$48 | ||
Intel Celeron M 440 vs AMD Athlon II X4 640 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$48 | $67 | |
Intel Celeron M 440 vs Pentium E2140 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$48 | ||
Intel Celeron M 440 vs Core2 Duo E6300 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $50 | |
Intel Core i3 3220 vs AMD A4 5300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
Intel Core i7 6700K vs AMD A12 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||