Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 550

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 550

Report a correction
Significantly lower typical power consumption 3.25W vs 28.44W 8.7x lower typical power consumption
Newer Sep, 2007 vs Jul, 2006 Release date over 1 years later
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 0.96 $/year vs 8.43 $/year 8.8x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 3.5 $/year vs 30.66 $/year 8.7x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron M 440

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 440

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 CPU score 980 vs 877 More than 10% better 3DMark06 CPU score
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 180 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 0.55 GHz Around 3.8x higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.13 MB Around 7.8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.13 MB/core Around 7.8x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.57 GHz vs 2.27 GHz More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.98 GHz vs 2 GHz Around 2x better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 550 vs 440

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 550  vs
440 
Clock speed 0.55 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
479
495
LGA 775
M

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 4W 35W
Annual home energy cost 0.96 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 3.5 $/year 30.66 $/year
Typical power consumption 3.25W 28.44W

details

Celeron M 550  vs
440 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 0.13 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.13 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 180 nm 65 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.27 GHz 3.57 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 3.98 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.27 GHz 3.57 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 100 MHz 800 MHz
Intel Celeron M 550
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 440
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus