Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 550

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 550

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 550 vs the Atom Z3735F.

Front view of Intel Atom Z3735F

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom Z3735F

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 550 vs Atom Z3735F

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 550  vs
Atom Z3735F 
Clock speed 0.55 GHz 1.33 GHz
Cores Single core Quad core
Socket type
479
495
BGA 592

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
EM64T
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 4W 2.2W
Annual home energy cost 0.96 $/year 0.53 $/year
Typical power consumption 3.25W 1.79W

details

Celeron M 550  vs
Atom Z3735F 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 1 4
L2 cache 0.13 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 0.13 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 180 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.27 GHz 1.63 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 1.83 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.27 GHz 1.63 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
GPU clock speed N/A 311 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 646 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Celeron M 550
Report a correction
Intel Atom Z3735F
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus