Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Celeron M 550

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 550

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 550 vs the Atom N270.

Front view of Intel Atom N270

Reasons to consider the
Intel Atom N270

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Celeron M 550 vs Atom N270

3D Mark 06 (CPU)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Celeron M 550  vs
Atom N270 
Clock speed 0.55 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
479
495
437

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 4W 2.5W
Annual home energy cost 0.96 $/year 0.6 $/year
Typical power consumption 3.25W 2.03W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 100 MHz 533 MHz

details

Celeron M 550  vs
Atom N270 
Architecture x86 x86
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 0.13 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 0.13 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 180 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 2.27 GHz 1.87 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.27 GHz 1.87 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Celeron M 550
Report a correction
Intel Atom N270
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus